Feed on
Posts
Comments

News Recap

It’s been a crazy couple of weeks of travel, recuperation, school work, etc. Having just returned from L.A. for the annual Association of American Geographers meeting, I thought I’d just recap a number of news items.

AG-GAG LAWS

The most relevant for animal advocates is the increasingly public flurry of debate about ag-gag laws. Will Potter, of Green is the New Red, has been following the emergence and politics of the ag-gag laws for the last several years and regularly posts updates, commentary and information on his blog about it. I’m not going to recap the details of the state-by-state debate because Potter is already doing that on his site. But for those not familiar, ag-gag laws are state legislation that would criminalize the photography and video taping of what goes on behind industrial “factory farm” walls, as well as criminalize the undercover investigations by activists in these spaces. These undercover investigations and accompanying video and photo footage are important because they are often the only glimpse the general public has into how animals are bred, farmed, treated and slaughtered in the industrial food system. An even more widespread debate is now underway because the New York Times published an article about the ag-gag laws a couple of weeks ago. I plan to write extensively about ag-gag laws and the similar federal Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA) in my dissertation to explore a politics of (in)access in spaces of agricultural production, but for now there is lots to read in the media about this issue. Have you all been following the ag-gag debate? What are your thoughts?

AAG

In personal news, I spent the last week at the AAG conference in L.A., which is a massive geographers conference generally drawing around 8,000 geographers. It is truly massive and generally overwhelming with nearly thirty sessions happening simultaneously across three downtown hotels and lasting 5 days (each year is in a different city). I won’t bore you all with a detailed recap of each day, but I will make a few observations. Generally, I try to stick to animal/nonhuman-related sessions at the AAG simply because the schedule is so overwhelming, but this year I branched out. I definitely attended my fair share of animal geographies sessions and saw a couple of really fantastic talks (not the least of which was a fascinating talk on extending who we count as the “animal” in animal geographies — he was advocating the ethical consideration of the tick). But I spent quite a bit of my time going to sessions on topics like violence in the humanitarian present (organized by Tish Lopez), illicit commodities (in which Rosemary-Claire Collard gave a great talk on animal auctions), and a session on suffering, trauma and pain. I found myself literally moved to tears in quite a few of the sessions, which was a surprise to me. A theme across these various great sessions was storytelling — both direct storytelling of a particular place and experience of trauma (murders and disappearances at the US-Mexico border, international sex trafficking of young women, etc.) and reflections on the ethics and politics of telling others’ stories in our research. Many of these stories were heartbreaking — stories of unimaginable sadness, violence and pain. Through my own emotional reaction to this research, I found myself reflecting on the reactions of the audience to these kinds of stories. And, in particular, I was interested in how the reaction of the audience may be different (i.e., complicated) when we are complicit and/or implicated in the violence expressed in the stories. For instance, we are all somewhat implicated in supporting a capitalist global economy that enables things like war or sex trafficking, but we seem to be more directly implicated in, say, the violence against the animals used for food if we choose to eat meat, dairy or eggs. This made me think a lot about how these stories are received and how the experience of those experience pain, violence and trauma may be obscured and/or sidelined when others are reacting to these stories with guilt, defensiveness, etc. 

VIOLENCE 

I assume most of you heard the awful news about the bombings in Boston, and the explosion at the fertilizer plant in West Texas. Two devastating instances of death, injury and loss in U.S. news this week, along with many other local reports of violence, I’m sure. I’ve heard a lot of talk this week about “The End of Days” and questions about what the world is coming to. There is no doubt that this violence strikes close to home and shakes our feeling of safety and security. And we naturally search for ways of understanding and making sense of it. As I’ve been trying to make sense of this news, I couldn’t help but ask myself what acts of violence, death, and mayhem were going un- (or under-) reported in light of these tragedies at home. So, I did a search on other bombings and deaths around the world, and came up with this article from the Associated Press. The article, “Boston Attacks are Reminder of Violence Elsewhere,” reminds us that this week, there are horrific instances of violence involving mass deaths occurring this week in places such as Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Bahrain,  Central African Republic, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. As we engage in mourning the deaths and injury occuring in the U.S. this week, let’s also include in our hearts and thoughts the 120 killed daily in Syria, the 55 Iraqis killed Monday in a suicide bombing in Fallujah, the more than 30 people killed in Somalian bombings on Sunday, the 20 people killed in the Central African Republic (including the bombing of a church), the deaths of a family of 8 in a roadside bomb in Afghanistan on Monday, the deaths of those involved in Pakistan’s elections this week, and all those who have been victims of violence, murder, rape, human trafficking, kidnapping and torture around the world. As I go through the week, I keep hearing whispers of disbelief, “These kinds of things don’t happen HERE” as if this kind of violence is normalized in other parts of the world, but not in the U.S. But the truth is that these kinds of things happen everywhere and when we bury our heads in the sand about violence elsewhere in between reportings of mass shootings and bombings in the U.S., we risk not making any change. When we do not actively work against the violence of war, the violence of labor conditions, the violence of mass incarceration, the violence against animals in every way they are used and exploited, and the violence against every distant other, we perpetuate a system so thoroughly rooted in violence that these things can’t help but continue to happen.

So, I send out warm thoughts of love, compassion and non-violence to those in Boston, those involved in the accident in West Texas, those in the Middle East and elsewhere who are suffering from loss, trauma and injury. May you all find some peace.

Treme-Done-NOLA

Source: HBO

I hope everyone is having a good weekend! I thought I’d start a series of “Top Tens” as a kind of lighter, fun change of pace for the blog. Plus, I thought it would be a great way to hear back from you all about your favorites in the comments section, so we can all learn about new great things! I was thinking favorite TV shows, favorite movies and/or documentaries, favorite books, favorite food ingredients, favorite vegetables/fruits, etc. Other ”Top Ten” list ideas?  

Today, since it’s the weekend and I’ve been known to enjoy a little TV now and then, I thought I’d share my top ten TV shows of all time in no particular order (except number one is my current number one pick).

1. Treme

2. Doctor Who (2005-Present)

3. Mad Men

4. Firefly

5. Misfits

6. Californication

7. Shameless (US)

8. Walking Dead

9. Breaking Bad

10. Downton Abbey 

So there they are! Do you have ten favorite TV shows of all time? Let’s hear ‘em!

 

Tags: , ,

I heard Melanie Joy (author of Why we love dogs, eat pigs and wear cows) speak a couple of times at the national Animal Rights conference last summer in Alexandria, VA. During one of her talks she asked for hands of those in the audience who had ever pretended not to be sick or downplayed their illness specifically because of their veganism. Nearly everyone in the room raised their hand. We all had a good laugh about it at the time — it’s ridiculous to pretend you’re not sick just to protect the image of veganism. And yet, many of us often do it. There are so many folks out there ready to pounce on your veganism as a reason for ill health… “Well, you probably wouldn’t have that cold if you just ate some meat or dairy…” or “Jeez, Jane really seems to be sick a lot. It’s probably because she’s not getting enough protein or calcium on her vegan diet…” Heck, even complaining about being a bit tired can bring on critiques of veganism. As Melanie Joy said in her talk, as vegans, we hold ourselves to higher standards of health and we are held to higher standards of health. But none of us are super-human and though a well-balanced vegan diet is now recognized to be an excellent preventive or treatment for various illnesses, we are still going to get sick sometimes! Even so, I’ve been somewhat resistant to talking about recent health issues I’ve been having specifically because I don’t want to promote an image of a “sickly vegan.”

I’m going to share a bit about my personal health journey without going into excessive detail. I’ve had this unexplained *severe* abdominal pain for the last 4-5 months. It comes and goes. Sometimes it’s excrutiating and has landed me in the ER. Most of the time it’s moderate pain and discomfort and I feel like I’ve adjusted to pain being my new “normal”. Nothing makes it better or worse; it doesn’t seem to matter what I eat. Painkillers don’t help (I was even given IV morphine during an ER visit and it did nothing to the pain). I’ve spent the last 4 months going back and forth to doctors and specialists, having every kind of test, trying lots of different medications, etc. Finally, the gastroenterologist said the last thing we could try was an endoscopy, and if that didn’t turn up anything, then I would just have to wait it out (“These things sometimes just resolve on their own,” he said). So I waited and waited for the endoscopy date and had the test yesterday. Everything looked normal.  There was nothing to explain the pain. I had really been wanting to wait to blog about this until I had found a cause of the pain and could write a nice tidy blog post explaining my journey to finding answers, with a happy ending (e.g., it was my gall bladder and I just needed to have it removed, it was an ulcer, etc.). It has been incredibly frustrating to have Western conventional medicine fail to uncover anything and reach the point where the doctors are ready to say I just need to wait it out.

My next plan is to find a good naturopath and see what they have to say. Honestly, I don’t know why I ever went back to a regular doctor — I used to see a wonderful naturopath in Seattle who would spend 1-2 hours talking with me about every aspect of my health in a holistic way that took into account my whole body and not just one part of it. She unfortunately closed her practice and then I fell into going to the clinic at school for medical care. Do any of you lovely readers have recommendations for great naturopaths in Seattle who are supportive of a vegan diet? Have any of you had good experiences working with a naturopath for healing? 

I’m thinking since no medical reason has turned up, perhaps it’s something I’m eating on a regular basis that’s causing the problems… I’m hoping to try an elimination diet guided by a naturopath/nutritionist. Since I have already cut out some of the common culprits (e.g., dairy), I’m hoping it might be relatively straightforward to identify if anything (like gluten or nightshades) are causing problems. I would love to hear if any of you have had experience trying an elimination diet. Did it work? What method of elimination diet did you use? Did you do a self-guided elimination diet, or did you work with a medical professional? I think sometimes it can help to talk about these things as a community — to share experiences, thoughts, etc. Thank you!

Tags: , ,

Good morning, Monday readers! Today I want to share a call for papers I’ve been working on with my colleague and friend, Rosemary-Claire Collard — for a Critical Animal Geographies edited scholarly anthology. Please consider submitting an abstract for consideration and it would be great if you could spread the word if you’re so inclined!

Call for Contributors to Critical Animal Geographies edited volume

Fifteen years after the publication of the groundbreaking Animal Geographies (Wolch & Emel 1998), followed by Animal Spaces, Beastly Places (Philo & Wilbert 2000), a growing number of geographers now readily acknowledge the nonhuman animal as an important site of intellectual inquiry. Following the call to “bring the animals back in” to the discipline (Wolch & Emel 1995), animal geographers have taken up the project of “decentering the human in human geography” (Anderson 2013) by reckoning with the inescapable contingency of the human subject. This has yielded fascinating and important explorations of deeply constitutive human-animal relations and the spaces, traces, violences and practices that enable them and are left in their wake.

Since the “third wave” of animal geographies (Urbanik 2012) in the 1990s, billions of real animals have continued to service humans and capitalist accumulation as food, labourers, entertainment, clothing, biomedical research subjects, and companions. Human-animal relationships are fraught with complex dynamics of power and privilege involving the uneven appropriation of lives, labours and bodies across species, including humans. At the same time, humans and animals have an extraordinary capacity for engaging in inter-species relationships of mutual care, love, and companionship. These ambivalent material-semiotic entanglements between humans and animals are both at stake and implicated in contemporary ecological crises, bringing a critical urgency to the task of rethinking dominant orders (capitalist, species, juridico-political, scientific) that structure human-animal relations.

As geographers, we have just scratched the surface of academic inquiry into the rich and varied lives of animals, the ethical and political questions relating to human-animal relations, and the implications for thinking about alternative modes of being in this multispecies world. Critical human geography has traditionally aimed not merely to interpret and analyze the world, but to change it. In such a spirit, this edited volume makes a call for a distinct critical animal geography – one that interprets the complex plurality of human-animal relations, but does not stop there. Critical animal geographies interrogate structures of power and social inequality across species lines and presuppose a commitment to understanding and destabilizing the status quo and reimagining alternative visions of human-animal relations.   

The aim of this edited volume is to feature cutting edge critical animal geographies research that radically rethinks how we conceptualize our relationship and responsibility to nonhuman animals. We are interested in empirical and theoretical engagements rooted in critical geographic research relating to animals and human-animal relations. We are also interested in fresh perspectives on methodological approach and on extending critical and radical theoretical framings to include animal geographies work. Chapters may include (but are not limited to) engagement with feminist/eco-feminist, political economy, post-humanist, cyborg/hybrid, anarchist, post-colonial, and queer literatures in order to envision a diverse set of epistemological, ontological and methodological perspectives on animals.

We ask that anyone interested in contributing to this Critical Animal Geographies volume submit a one page CV (including previous publications) and an abstract of no more than 500 words by June 1, 2013. If your abstract is selected for inclusion in the book, full chapters will be due February 1, 2014.   

Please send abstracts and direct any questions to the volume editors: Katie Gillespie (katieag@u.washington.edu) and Rosemary-Claire Collard (rcollard@geog.ubc.ca).

References:

Anderson, Kay. 2013. “Mind over Matter? On Decentering the Human in Human Geography,” Annual Cultural Geographies Lecture, Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, April 12.

Philo, Chris & Chris Wilbert. 2000. Animal Spaces, Beastly Places. Routledge.

Urbanik, Julie. 2012. Placing Animals. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Wolch, Jennifer & Jody Emel. 1998. Animal Geographies. London: Verso.

Wolch, Jennifer & Jody Emel. 1995. Guest-edited issue: Bringing the animals back in. Environment & Planning D: Society and Space, 13(6).

 

Tags: , ,

No doubt some of you have already seen the news that Bill Gates is advocating plant-based “meat” alternatives as a solution to the environmental drain on resources by the global production of animal products. If you haven’t seen it, you can see the snazzy slideshow here.  On GatesNotes.com, the Future of Food is pitched in these terms:

 

Meat consumption worldwide has doubled in the last 20 years, and it is expected to double again by 2050. This is happening in large part because economies are growing and people can afford more meat. That’s all good news. But raising meat takes a great deal of land and water and has a substantial environmental impact. Put simply, there’s no way to produce enough meat for 9 billion people. Yet we can’t ask everyone to become vegetarians. We need more options for producing meat without depleting our resources.

Over the past few years I’ve come across a few companies that are doing pioneering work on innovations that give a glimpse into possible solutions. To be sure, it’s still very early, but the work these companies are doing makes me optimistic. I wanted to share with you a look at their work on creating alternatives to meat and eggs that are just as healthful, are produced more sustainably, and taste great.

Read on to learn how their work can benefit everyone.” SOURCE

On the surface, this all sounds pretty great — or at least not bad. Economies are growing. People are making more money and can afford more “meat.” “Meat” consumption is skyrocketing, which is not sustainable. But not to worry — there’s a technological fix for the problem. There are corporations working to find innovative solutions to animal-derived food products so that all 9 billion people on the planet can eat “meat” if they choose to. Afterall, “we can’t ask everyone to become vegetarians!” The approach here is appealing in part because it’s pragmatic. Gates is acknowledging the problem that vegans have long been aware of — that animal products are wholly unsustainable.  And he’s offering what appears to be a ‘rational’ solution (make more sustainable “meat” out of plants)!

Don’t get me wrong. I think it’s great that Gates may be hopping on the plant-based bandwagon. The more the merrier and the better for the animals who are not raised, slaughtered and eaten because of it. However, I think we should think carefully and critically about what this kind of move entails. I’m just going to share a few of my thoughts on the matter and I would love to hear your perspectives on this initiative in the comments below! There is so much more to say about this and I can already tell I’m not even going to scratch the surface.

The Techno-Fix

Gates states, “The meat market is ripe for reinvention.” He shares with us that, in addition to companies developing “meat” and egg replacements, spices are being reinvented to taste salty, but with very low sodium. These technological developments are supposedly going to be better for everyone — they are supposedly healthier, they are supposedly better for the environment, and they will supposedly get plant-based protein sources to people living in poverty around the globe. It’s the “people around the world are starving and this one technology could feed the world!” discourse. Sound familiar? It’s been used again and again. And connected specifically to Gates, this is the language that has been used to justify the production, promotion and distribution of genetically modified (GM) seeds (a topic for other posts). And while these technologies may be taken up uncritically by the corporate philanthropy industry, they have been rejected by local communities around the globe.

I think at the heart of this problem of the techno-fix is the way the accumulation of capital is tied up in discourses of philanthropy, which is a classic problem of the uncritical adoption of development projects around the world. It makes it more difficult to argue with a company like Monsanto when they are promoting powerful discourses of “feeding the world” and “ending world hunger,” no matter how different the reality might be. These complex techno-fixes (e.g., GM seeds) intentionally obscure simpler solutions in order to protect the interests of those who gain (billions $!) from the production of patented commodities.    

The Vegan Avoidance

Another thing that bothers me about the discourse in the Future of Food slideshow is the upfront assumption that “we can’t ask everyone to be vegetarian.” Gates is taking this classically pragmatic approach that says, “listen, guys, obviously, it’s irrational to expect anyone to be vegetarian, so let’s find another solution.” The implicit assumption is that vegans (and those who advocate widespread veganism) are irrational and/or unpragmatic. But isn’t it a bit irrational to be so attached to the taste of “meat” that you’re willing to go to great lengths and expense to develop fake “meat” products when there are simpler and tasty plant-based whole foods.  

To be honest, I’m not really sure what Gates is trying to say about vegetarianism. He is advocating the production of plant-based “meat” products, but he is also saying that we can’t expect the world to be vegetarian. But, if he got his way and these plant-based “meats” were adopted worldwide, wouldn’t that be making the world vegetarian (or at least heading in that direction)? Or is he advocating adoption of plant-based ”meats” for those living in poverty around the world and those who can afford the “real thing” can continue to buy “meat” with a clear conscience now that we’ve taken care of those who are newly able to afford ”meat”? Does he envision these “meats” replacing animal proteins entirely, or just supplementing animal proteins so that the global elite can avoid being inconvenienced by the impending ecological crisis caused by their consumption practices? 

Even in spite of my questions about this initiative, I will be interested to see how it develops and how Gates’ involvement evolves (e.g., will the Gates Foundation take this project on or will this be more of a personal project?). It certainly is a powerful statement for Gates to advocate plant-based eating!

Thoughts? I’d love to hear your ideas/reactions to this on both ends of the spectrum! Happy Friday, by the way!   

Tags: , , ,

IMG_1422

Happy first day of spring (yesterday)! In Seattle, spring has officially sprung. Daffodils are bright and beautiful, the cherry trees are pink and white and breathtaking, and the daphne makes the air smell sweet and flowery. The weather has been a little all over the place — sunny one moment, raining the next — and really feels like the change of seasons. Things have been a bit crazy here in the world of Serenity in the Storm, so just a quick update before I dive back into my to-do lists. Maizy has had a rough go of it with her digestive system lately and we have had many consults with the vet (thankfully, it seems like that’s working itself out); Saoirse is terrified (I mean, terrified!) of the sun reflecting in through the windows and making weird shadows on the ceiling; Eden narrowly escaped a tumor (which turned out to just be a muscle — over-protective parent here!); Abigail is generally cranky that she’s not the only-animal in our lives; Eric has been doing lots of projects around the house now that he is temporarily unemployed; and I’ve been battling abdominal pain and migraines and am eagerly awaiting an endoscopy in a couple of weeks to see what the problem might be. School stuff has been busy, busy, busy. It’s funny how, even when I’m not teaching, the end of the quarter feels insane (this is finals week). I finally submitted my paper on sexualized violence and the gendered commodification of the animal body in the dairy industry to a journal and now I’ve got to get going on the next one and try to forget the agony of waiting for feedback! The AAG (annual geographer’s meeting) is at the beginning of April in LA and I’m preparing for that. Lots of long-term projects and little immediate things to do and I’m trying to wrap up lots of things before my mom comes to visit next week. We’ve already got quite a few items on the agenda for her visit (a trip to the nursery, some gardening, some walks in the great outdoors, shopping, Passover Seder, and a trip to visit my soon-to-be-99-year-old (!) grandmother in Portland). We try to pack in as many fun things as we can when she comes to visit since we don’t get to see each other that often.

There’s something about spring showing up that makes me feel energized and productive… I suppose it’s the rebirth of the landscape, the baby birds and animals being born, and longer days that make us feel alive and engaged with the world after a long winter. We have been trying to celebrate spring by cleaning out the garden, taking walks with the dogs and doing some spring cleaning in the house to clear the decks for a new season. What do you do to celebrate spring?

Tags: ,

IMG_3774

One of the first meals Eric ever made for me when I came out to visit him in Seattle years and years ago was fettucini alfredo. It was a delicious, romantic meal loaded with heavy cream and cheese and whatever else goes into a super-rich dairy-laden alfredo sauce. Of course, as soon as we were finished eating, I immediately started having horrible stomach cramps and spent the whole evening in the bathroom. Needless to say, we got much more familiar with each other that evening with a huge bathroom experience in a one-bedroom apartment than I would have liked. :-) I should have known then that I was destined to become vegan for more reasons than just the animals! Even though that night was a disaster bathroom-wise, I still remember it with fondness because I felt so loved.

I was delighted to see on The Kind Life a recipe for a vegan fettucini alfredo and I decided to make it last night. It was delicious and really rich and so filling. But guess what? No bad stomach reaction! And there’s really nothing so bad for you in it either (especially if you were to make it with a healthier kind of pasta).

The recipe is by Allison Rivers Samson of Allison’s Gourmet and here is the link to THE RECIPE.

I made a few slight alterations. I added a little red pepper for some heat. I blended it twice (once before heating as she suggests and once mid-way through heating because I decided it wasn’t smooth enough). I just have a regular blender (not a VitaMix) and it ended up a little gritty at the end, but the flavor was spot-on. I think next time I make it I will try soaking the cashews overnight the night before to make it creamier and try to eliminate that slight grit.

Have you tried a vegan alfredo recipe that you love? Or have you found a vegan version of something you never thought you’d have again since you became vegan?

Tags: , , , ,

Morning, readers! At the end of last summer, I went to a number of “livestock” auctions where animals were being auctioned off by the pound for “meat”. I wrote about this experience here on the blog when I had had a little more distance from this one particular auction. But the morning after I attended a ”cull market” auction, I wrote this piece for Our Hen House. It’s up today and I welcome you to read it and share your own thoughts about these spaces.  This is the third part in a three-part Untold Testimony series. The first was Betsy’s story. And the second was Maizy’s. Feel free to comment with any thoughts and reactions; I think it’s good to have conversations about these spaces of routinized violence. Thanks for reading!

Earlier this week, Melissa (of the lovely blog, Mending Creation) responded to the Academic Writing and Scholar-Activism post with a question about why I chose Geography as my field/discipline. I’ve been feeling particularly positive about Geography lately, so this is a good time to reflect on the choice to do work in this discipline. Bear with me; this is going to be a long post! If you’re itching for the “Why Geography?” part, just skip on down to that section and skip the part that details (rather long-windedly) my journey to geography…  

My Journey to Geography

I was never planning to be a geographer; I was going to be a fiction writer. My whole life up through college was geared toward creative writing. As a kid, I took summer writing workshops and in school, English and creative writing were my favorite subjects. I spent long hours (and many bitter tears) receiving feedback and instruction from my writing professor father. He has a gift with language that I’ve never seen anywhere else — his love of language for the sake of language, the way he can make words come together in a beautifully rendered sentence…it’s extraordinary and, ironically, words can’t describe what a wonderful (if at times, difficult) experience it has been to learn to write from him.

I chose a college (Sarah Lawrence) based on their writing program because I wanted to go somewhere where I could write something really long. When I got to Sarah Lawrence, I signed up for writing workshops and meandered through my time there taking courses that interested me. Sarah Lawrence doesn’t have majors or grades, so it really allows you to explore and follow your interests without worrying about requirements. It was an extraordinary educational experience and I am so grateful to have had the opportunity to study there. 

Looking back now, I don’t think I was ever a writer of fiction. In my fiction workshops, I wrote the truth. I wrote the world as I saw it and I turned in nonfiction stories, pulled straight from my life (billed as fiction) to my teachers. It’s funny, even though I’ve been writing nonfiction exclusive with no pretense of being fiction for the last five, six, seven years, it was only in the last month that I realized, I am a nonfiction writer. Last month, I read two books on publishing — one on finding a literary agent and one on writing a nonfiction book proposal — and through this reading, I had the realization about nonfiction. Go figure.

But back to the long and meandering path to Geography. Sarah Lawrence, amazingly, has these year-long classes. I wish more colleges/universities did this, because you really get to dig deeply into a subject. Not like the excruciating 10-week quarter system I’m on now where there’s a sense of desperation to reach the students in the blink of an eye before they’re gone. In my final year at Sarah Lawrence, I took one of these year-long courses entitled “Food, Agriculture, Environment, and Development” by a geographer (Joshua Muldavin) and everything changed for me.

My mom and dad have always been very politically active in the leftist movement and my sister and I grew up with a wonderful community of compassionate and strong women and men working to make the world more just. My mom has always worked in human services and has dedicated her time and energy to providing social services to vulnerable populations. I spent my childhood going to women’s rights and anti-war marches and demonstrations in Washington D.C. One of the first that I can remember was a pro-choice demonstration in D.C.  I was pretty little and I remember the speakers were really bashing the president (it must have been Reagan at the time) and I remember feeling so bad for what I imagined was this feeble old man sitting in this white house somewhere. I’ve come along way from there… :-)   All this to say that I grew up with a sense that I wanted to work for justice in the world.

When I took Muldavin’s class at Sarah Lawrence, I finally felt like something fell into place. I had been having some uneasiness about pursuing a future in creative writing and food justice made so much sense to me. Uncovering the injustices in the food system brought the values I had been raised with, together with the most basic need for food. This was just before the alternative food movement and the Michael Pollanization of U.S. pop culture had exploded, so taking this class blew my mind and set me on a different course. As I was graduating from college, I went to Joshua Muldavin and said, “what should I do? your course changed my life?” I told him I was headed to Seattle to be with Eric… He said, “why don’t you go to graduate school in geography at the University of Washington?” And that’s precisely what I did. Well, not exactly that directly…I took a few years off and still applied to an MFA in Creative Writing alongside Geography. But ultimately I ended up in Geography.

I went to UW planning to study urban agriculture and alternative urban food systems. But about six months in I met Maria Elena Garcia, who teaches undergrad classes on rethinking human/animal relations in the Comparative History of Ideas Department. We did an independent reading quarter on food politics and she snuck in a book on animal rights/ethics — The Ethics of What We Eat by Peter Singer and Jim Mason. That book, along with Maria Elena’s gentle guidance, turned me (and Eric) vegan and radically changed the trajectory of my research interests. Prior to this shift, Eric and I were supporters of the alternative meat/dairy movement and had completely bought into the ”humane” movement. When I read Singer and Mason’s book (and then many more), I was outraged that this so-called “humane meat” movement was gaining so much momentum as an “alternative” to mainstream agriculture. I decided to change my MA project to one that reconceptualized “humane slaughter.”

When I made this shift in Geography, it was rocky, to say the least. I was told that I didn’t belong in Geography and that I would be better off going to work with Peter Singer. I was told that my work wasn’t Geography. In those early years of grad school, things were rough and I had to fight for my place in the discipline and in the department. I had to get prepared — very quickly – to be able to argue for how my work on animals in the food system was geographical. This was really hard, but eventually, I feel like I’ve finally found my place.

Why Geography?

Geography is not the geography of grade school. Of course, some geographers do physical geography and focus on cartography and a lot of geographers make some pretty amazing maps! But Human Geography is a different thing entirely. I remember hearing a couple of great responses for those times when you’re at a cocktail party (I don’t go to many cocktail parties, FYI) and someone asks, “What’s Geography?!”  One response is: ”Geography is the why of where.”  Thought-provoking, eh? I’ll just let that sit for a minute… :-)

The other cocktail party answer is that geography is like any other social science (anthropology, sociology, etc.), except it emphasizes in a very real and important way, place and space. This might seem obvious, but it’s amazing how much academic work can actually forget that things happen in places and that these places shape, and are shaped by, the processes occurring there. Place matters. Geography also draws special attention to space and geographers do work that explores spaces as broad and far-reaching as the global political economy and spaces as intimate as the body. Adrienne Rich once said that the body is “the geography of the closest in.” I love that.

I sometimes joke that you can study just about anything in Geography because everything happens in a place! And animals in agriculture are no exception. Animals, as a specific topic of study, certainly don’t feature prominently in human geography — it is, after all, human geography. Animal geographies are a fairly tiny subset within the discipline and they are quite varied in the topics and approaches they take. Critical animal geographies/studies — those that work for animal liberation — are an even tinier subset. This makes it a bit lonely at times in the discipline, but there are great things about Geography that make it a wonderful place to work on critical animal studies. I currently have an advisor who is wonderfully supportive and my experience of graduate school has been great!

Geography has a strong social and environmental justice tradition and there are many geographers who are critically engaged in feminist, Marxist, and radical scholarship. This makes for an, at times, wonderfully critical and self-reflexive environment — one where we can all push ourselves to engage in more critical reflection on issues of gender, race, sexuality, etc. I think animal justice concerns are an extension of this and quite a few people I’ve met in the discipline have been open to thinking critically about human use of animals (even if their work is not focused on this issue). There is some really amazing work being done in Geography and some of this work works as a powerful frame for thinking about animals. Because of how varied the subjects of study are in Geography, the discipline is highly interdisciplinary and meshes nicely with work in other fields — critical animal studies, environmental politics, political science, anthropology, history, sociology, gender, women, and sexuality studies…and more.

There’s certainly more to say about Geography, why it’s great, how animals fit in, etc. but I fear I’ve gone on too long… If you made it to the end, thank you! You deserve a vegan brownie or something else delicious.

Happy Friday! I hope you have something nice and relaxing planned for the weekend!

Tags: ,

IMG_3762

Good morning! We’re coming off of three glorious days of spring sunny weather here in Seattle and when I woke up this morning, the clouds and grey were back like a cozy blanket. I don’t mind the clouds and drizzle, in fact I love it a lot of the time, but this morning it makes me feel like crawling back into bed. Yesterday, Eric and I headed out into the yard to do some manual labor involving digging and cement and hanging out with the chickens. In preparation, I threw together a grain bowl for lunch before heading outside.

I don’t know why I don’t make grain bowls more often. They’re also called hippie bowls and here is one option from the Daily Garnish and a nice deconstructed list of options for hippie or ‘buddha’ bowls from Gluten Free for Good. They’re really easy to make (especially if you keep some cooked grains in the fridge to have on hand) and so nutritious. Plus, grain bowls can be completely customized to your particular tastes and if you live with someone who has different taste preferences, you can each prepare your grain bowl just to your liking. The possibilities are really endless. You can use any kind of grain, any kind of vegetables — cooked or raw — and any kind of protein and sauce (or none!). You can go as simple as you like or go all out and pile that bowl high will all kinds of yummy things. Aside from more standard vegetables, you can add nuts and seeds, sea vegetables, dried or fresh fruit, nut butters, sauerkraut, kimchi or other fermented foods, tofu, tempeh, beans or lentils, etc.

Grain Bowl Sample “Recipe”

Serves 1-2

1-1 1/2 cups cooked grain

raw carrot, thinly sliced

raw daikon, thinly sliced

raw cabbage, thinly sliced

raw kale, chopped

cucumber, thinly sliced,

avocado, sliced

green onion, chopped

lemon

salt and pepper

Use a large soup bowl and put the grain in the bottom. Pile a little handful of each of the vegetables on top. Squeeze a generous helping of lemon juice over the top. Add a little sea salt and fresh ground pepper. 

Yesterday, I made a big bowl of this and ate about half of it (I used only half an avocado). When I realized there was no way I was going to eat the whole thing in one sitting, I ate up all the avocado, since it doesn’t keep well, covered the bowl with a plate and stuck it in the fridge for later. Later on, when I got hungry, I pulled out the bowl, cut up the other half an avocado on top and ate the rest. A great tasting, healthy and filling meal that fed me all day long.

What kinds of things would you like to eat in a grain bowl? Any favorite combos or fun ideas?

Tags: , , , , ,

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »